The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition (WP(C) No.11211/2016) after respondents complied with previous directions. The current petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv.
versus
RAJIV MEHRISHI, HOME SECRETARY, UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Panwar, CGSC with Mr. Abhimanyu Chauhan & Ms. Anoosha Panwar, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R % 12.07.2018
In view of the circumstance that the respondents have since complied with the directions contained in the order dated 03.03.2017 passed by this court in WP(C) No.11211/2016, Mr. Ajay Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 12, 2018 ak
DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAV
RAJIV MEHRISHI
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
