Petitioner sought admission to Shri Ram College of Commerce, University of Delhi. Court allowed withdrawal of petition as petitioner was granted admission based on sporting ability during pendency.
Leave to withdraw petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
versus VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 16.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions states, that during the pendency of the petition, Ms. Vanshika Sachar, the petitioner herein, has been granted admission by the Shri Ram College of Commerce, University of Delhi, on the basis of her sporting ability in Table Tennis; and in view thereof, the relief prayed for in the present petition has been satisfied.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Leave granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 16, 2018 dn
Vanshika Sachar
Vice Chancellor, University of Delhi
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
