The High Court of Delhi dismissed a continuation application filed by Raj Gupta against Puneet Kumar Goel. The court held that the petition was not pressed due to the pendency of proceedings before the Supreme Court and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
RAJ GUPTA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate
versus
PUNEET KUMAR GOEL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajjay Arora, Adv. for SDMC
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R % 13.07.2018
In view of the pendency of the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, Ms. Amita Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, does not press this petition at this stage.
Dismissed as not pressed.
The pending application shall also stand disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 13, 2018 pk
Raj Gupta
Puneet Kumar Goel
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
