The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition is allowed. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
SABINA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K.Chaudhary, Adv.
versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for EDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 17.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings, if any, in accordance with law.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 17, 2018 ak
SABINA
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
