This writ petition sought an order directing the Delhi Development Authority to execute a Supplementary Lease Deed for a plot in Rohini after the petitioner deposited the required processing fee as directed earlier.
Direction to take action for execution of Supplementary Lease Deed within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#85
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment delivered on: 11.07.2018
W.P.(C) 7110/2018
SMT. ARCHANA SAINI ..... Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Talesara and Mr. S.V. Vats, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
J U D G M E N T
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)
CM APPL.27045/2018 (Exemption)
Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
W.P.(C) 7110/2018
Page 1 of 4
W.P.(C) 7110/2018 & CM APPL.27044/2018 (Stay)
1. The present petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
India instituted on behalf of the petitioner prays as follows:-
“Under the facts and circumstances stated herein above, it is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:-
2. Notice.
3. Mr. Arjun Pant, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/DDA.
4. With the consent of counsel for the parties the present writ petition has been heard finally and disposed of with the following order.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner invites my attention to a communication bearing No.F.37(1923) 03/LAB(Rohini)/20732
dated 26.12.2006, addressed by the DDA to the petitioner, whereby the latter was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.6,432/- in the State Bank of
W.P.(C) 7110/2018
Page 2 of 4
India/Central Bank, Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi within a period of 30 days from the date of issue of the said communication, for taking further action for execution of a Supplementary Lease Deed in relation to the subject property.
6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner further invites attention of this Court to the application annexed as Annexure P-4, which is a copy of the challan dated 19.01.2007, issued by the Central Bank, whereby the said sum of Rs.6,432/- was deposited.
7. It is, therefore, urged on behalf of the petitioner that the DDA ought to be directed to take further action, in accordance with law, for the execution of the Suppmentary Lease Deed, in relation to the subject property.
8. Mr. Arjun Pant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the DDA states that in terms of the said communication dated 26.12.2006, annexed as Annexure P-3 to the accompanying writ petition, and in view of the circumstance that the amount directed to be deposited thereunder, has been so deposited on behalf of the petitioner, the latter’s representation to take further action for execution of the Supplementary Lease Deed shall be taken, within a period of eight weeks from today, in accordance with law, under intimation to the petitioner.
W.P.(C) 7110/2018
Page 3 of 4
9. Directed accordingly.
10. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. The pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (JUDGE)
JULY 11, 2018 dn
W.P.(C) 7110/2018
Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the Respondent to execute a Supplementary Lease Deed after the petitioner deposited the demanded amount.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Archana Saini
Delhi Development Authority
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
