Petitioner withdrew the petition on instructions given an order in a related writ petition. The petition is dismissed as not pressed, and a pending application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
ARUN RATHI ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Advocate.
versus
KAPIL RASTOGI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Shekhar Vyas, Standing Counsel for NDMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R % 10.07.2018
In view of the order passed in the petition being W.P. (C) No.f/2018, titled as “ Dinesh Rathi vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors. ”, Ms. Sujata Kashyap, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, does not press this petition, at this stage.
The petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 10, 2018 RS
Arun Rathi
Kapil Rastogi & Ors.
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
