Dismissed
Vinay Dayal v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/6437/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VINAY DAYAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Aditya Vijay Kumar, Ms.Ruchika Khanna, Advocates
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jyoti Taneja, Mr. Rohit Arora, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R % 11.07.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to institute an appeal before the DTMCD in terms of the provisions of Section 347B of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. Leave and liberty is granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 11, 2018 pk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinay Dayal
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court