Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court granted leave, dismissing the main petition and pending applications as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw petition; petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
DINESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.P. Sharma, Advocate
versus
RAKESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
%
16.07.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Leave granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 16, 2018 dn
Dinesh Kumar
Rakesh Kumar Singh
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
