Dismissed
Manisha Kumari & Anr. v. Suber Ojaswi & Ors.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/331/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SUBER OJASWI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Siddharth Sindhu, Advocate for State. SHO Subeer Ojaswi with W/SI Chander Kanta, PS-Kapashera.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 16.07.2018
None appears for the petitioner, like on the last date. The petitioner has sought initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for having breached the order dated 13.04.2018 which had directed the provision of protection to the petitioners from respondent nos. 3 and 4- the parents of the girl.
The learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner no. 2 was never arrested. Petitioner no. 1 appeared before the Metropolitan Magistrate on 16.04.2018. It was found that she was a minor and the moment she turned a major, she went away from the Nari Niketan with petitioner no. 2- her husband.
In view of the above, no further orders are necessary. The petition is disposed-off accordingly.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
JULY 16, 2018/ RW
Manisha Kumari
Respondent No. 2
Najmi Wazri
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court