This court granted the petitioner leave to withdraw the contempt petition with liberty to assail the lower order on merits. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive adjudication was made.
Leave and liberty granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
BHUPINDER SINGH ANAND ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajnish Ranjan, Advocate. versus AMJAD TAK ..... Respondent Through Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R % 09.07.2018
After some arguments, Mr. Rajnish Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to assail the order dated 7th May, 2018, passed by the District Officer, District South, M.B. Road, Saket, New Delhi-110068, on the merits, in accordance with law.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 09, 2018 RS
Bhupinder Singh Anand
Amjad Tak
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
