In this interim matter, the High Court of Delhi granted leave to withdraw the writ petition because the respondent corporation informed that the impugned letter stands withdrawn, leading to disposal of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
RAJIV NATH REKHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kotla Harshavardhan & Ms. Mansi Sood, Advs.
versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 09.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the East Delhi Municipal Corporation has handed over in Court today a copy of the communication dated 6th July, 2018 issued by Administrative Officer, R.P.Cell, East Delhi Municipal Corporation to Sh. Sunil Kumar whereby the latter has been informed that the letter impugned in the present petition stands withdrawn.
In view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 09, 2018/ak
RAJIV NATH REKHI
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
