Daulat Ram v. J.B. Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge order in Delhi HC disposes of a pending writ petition after noting an Auditor was appointed to complete an audit as directed in a prior judgment, directing the latter to be concluded expeditiously.
What the court decided
$~27
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CONT.CAS(C) 482/2018 & CM APPL.25923/2018 DAULAT RAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartickay Mathur, Advocate versus J.B. SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Assistant Registrar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R % 04.07.2018
Mr. Devesh Singh, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the official respondent, on instructions from Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Assistant Registrar states that subsequent upon the order dated 30.05.2017, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 4996/2017, titled as ‘ Daulat Ram vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies and Ors. ’, and as prayed for by the petitioner, an Auditor has been appointed and that the latter shall conclude the audit expeditiously, in accordance with law, after considering all the allegations made by the petitioner in his representation dated 02.03.2017.
Directed accordingly.
In view of the foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. The pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 04, 2018/ dn
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Daulat Ram
- respondent
J.B. Singh
Coram
Siddharth Mridul
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court