Disposed

Shri Saurabh Jain v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Delhi HC4 Jul 2018W.P.(C)/4542/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh application for shop regularisation within two weeks. The North Delhi Municipal Corporation was directed to determine the fresh application within six weeks after affording an opportunity of being heard via a speaking order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to file fresh regularisation application within 2 weeks; Respondent to decide within 6 weeks after hearing.

Shri Saurabh Jain Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. — Delhi HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~14

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 4542/2018

¶4

SHRI SAURABH JAIN ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Rashi Singhal, Advocate along with Mr. Rakesh Kr. Jain, father of the petitioner.

¶5

versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.

¶6

..... Respondent Through Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for NDMC.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R % 04.07.2018

¶9

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) states that although, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking regularisation of Shop No. 1526/102, First Floor, Shrinathji Medicine Market, Bhagirat Palace, Chandni Chowk, Delhi110006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the subject shop’) was rejected as far back as on 22^nd December, 2016, a copy of the said rejection order is not traceable since the original file in relation thereto has been misplaced.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the NDMC further states that in the event, the petitioner were to file a fresh application for regularisation, the same would be disposed of, in accordance with law, after affording the latter an opportunity of being heard, within a specific time frame as may be directed by this Court.

¶11

W.P.(C) 4542/2018

¶12

page 1 of 2

¶13

In view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, states that the latter would file a fresh application seeking regularisation of the subject shop within two weeks from today.

¶14

Directed accordingly.

¶15

It is further directed that in the event, the petitioner files a fresh application for regularisation, the same shall be determined by the NDMC after affording an opportunity to the petitioner of being heard, by way of a speaking order, in accordance with law, within six weeks thereafter.

¶16

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶17

Copy of the order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties under signature of the Court Master.

¶18

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

¶19

JULY 04, 2018 RS

¶20

page 2 of 2

¶21

W.P.(C) 4542/2018

Shri Saurabh Jain v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Saurabh Jain v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj Electricals Vs Commissioner of Trade & Taxes

Arvind Kumar Gupta Vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.

Jaguar International Ltd. Vs UOI & Ors.

Godavari Nutrifoods Pvt. Ltd. Vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

Nims University Vs University Grants Commission & Ors.

Fashion Factory Impex Vs Commissioner of Value Added Tax

Shiv Singh Negi Vs Central Information Commission & Ors.

Lal Chand Vs Union of India and Ors.

Pradeep Kumar Gupta Vs Madhu Smita Patra

Poonam Suri & Anr. Vs Udai Pratap Singh & Ors.

Jeewan Jyoti Education Welfare Vs East Delhi Municipal Corporation

Naimuddin Ansari Vs East Delhi Municipal Corporation

Daulat Ram Vs J.B. Singh

Rajesh Kumar Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation