HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
Leave to withdraw granted; withdrawal of the petition and pending application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
POONAM SURI & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana and Ms. Akshita Chhatwal, Advocates
versus
UDAI PRATAP SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Komal Sorout and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advocae for Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for R-1 Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for R-3 & R-4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 03.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law, to assail the speaking order dated 27.06.2018 bearing F.No.HC(Plg.)(31398)2018/L/D-19 dated 27.06.2018, passed by the Delhi Development Authority.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 03, 2018 dn
Poonam Suri
Udai Pratap Singh
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
