A contempt petition filed against the Delhi Pradesh Rehri Patri Khomcha Hawkers Union and another was dismissed as not pressed, as the petitioner had filed related writ petitions.
The contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
DELHI PRADESH REHRI PATRI KHOMCHA HAWKERS UNION & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
versus
MADHU VYAS ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for North Delhi Municipal Corporation.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R
% 02.07.2018
Mr.Ramesh Kumar Mishra, counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact that he has filed W.P.(C) 6672/2018 & W.P.(C) 6673/2018, he does not press this contempt petition.
Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
JULY 02, 2018 rb/
Delhi Pradesh Rehri Patri Khomcha Hawkers Union & Anr.
Madhu Vyas
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
