Writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the subject property had been demolished prior to judgment, with liberty reserved for future proceedings.
Petition and pending applications disposed of as infructuous. Liberty reserved for appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 04.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that in view of the circumstance that the subject property has since been demolished on 28.06.2018, the relief prayed for in the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Counsel prays that the same may be disposed of accordingly.
Whilst disposing of the writ petition as having been rendered infructuous, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law, if so advised, in the event he is aggrieved by the action taken by the statutory respondent, in the meantime.
The present petition is disposed of and pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 04, 2018/ as
RAJESH KUMAR
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
