On a settlement agreement depositing Rs.1,65,000 inclusive of 50,000 cash and cheque encashment, the High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition and pending applications, refusing refund only for a prior court deposit.
Petition and pending applications disposed of; petitioner to refund Rs.1,54,810/- with interest from earlier deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
M/S VIKAS BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mahesh Srivastava and Mr. Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Advs.
versus
KANWAR SINGH ..... Respondent
Through: Respondent in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R % 10.05.2018
Rohini, New Delhi-110085 from the petitioner. He submits that the cheque has been encashed. He further submits that he has no claim with the petitioner.
VINOD GOEL, J.
MAY 10, 2018 “sandeep”
M/S Vikas Bharti Public School
Kanwar Singh
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
