Allowed

M/S G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Mahender Singh Verma and Ors.

Delhi HC11 May 2018W.P.(C)/9832/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge bench quashed the Authority's orders proceeding ex-parte and dismissing the petition's application to set aside such proceedings. Directed parties to appear before the Authority for fresh hearing with adequate time for disposal.

What did the court decide?

Orders dated 29.09.2016 and 10.08.2017 set aside; parties directed to appear before Authority by 02.07.2018.

M/S G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision : 11^th May, 2018

¶4

- W.P.(C) 9832/2017 & CM APPL. 40023/2017

¶5

M/S G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. …Petitioner Through: Mr.Gulshan Chawla and Mr.Satya Prakash Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

SH. MAHENDER SINGH VERMA AND ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr.R.S.Jena, Advocate.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

¶10

VINOD GOEL, J. (Oral)

¶11

By this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 29.09.2016 by which the petitioner was proceeded ex-parte by the Authority under Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954 (in short ‘Delhi Shops Act’) and the order dated 10.08.2017 dismissing its application for setting aside the ex-parte proceedings against it with costs of Rs.20,000/-.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact the petitioner was never served with the notice of the application filed by the respondent and when its AR was appearing on 16.02.2017 in another matter, the petitioner became aware of the proceedings and

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

WP (C) 9832/2017

¶15

filed necessary application which was dismissed on 10.08.2017 with costs.

¶16

He submits that in fact the respondent has filed an application claiming wages for overtime, for which the Authority under the Delhi Shops Act has no jurisdiction to deal with.

¶17

At this stage, the learned counsel for the respondent Shri R.S.Jena, Advocate submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is permitted to contest the application filed by the respondent. However, he submits that some time limit may be fixed for disposal of the application by the Authority under Delhi Shops Act. He submits that some litigation expenses may also be granted to the respondent.

¶18

In the facts and circumstances, the orders of the Authority dated 29.09.2016 and 10.08.2017 are hereby set aside. Both the parties are directed to appear before the Authority under Delhi Shops Act on 02.07.2018. The Authority under the Delhi Shops Act is directed to decide the application of the respondent within two months from the next date of hearing after giving due opportunities to both the parties. The petition is disposed of accordingly along with pending application being CM No.40023/2017.

¶19

(VINOD GOEL) JUDGE

¶20

MAY 11, 2018 dkb

¶21

Page 2 of 2

¶22

WP (C) 9832/2017

M/S G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Mahender Singh Verma and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Mahender Singh Verma and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bholanath Lal Vs M/S Shree Om Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Ram Sagar Vs M/S Shree Om Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Jeetnath Vs M/S Shree Om Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Harvinder Singh Vs Food Corporation of India & or

Delh Transport Corporation Vs Rakesh Kumar

Bijender Kumar and Ors. Vs Staff Selection Commission

Mukul Talwar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vrinda Grover Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Vikas Bharti Public School Vs Kanwar Singh

Rajeev Kumar an Others Vs Batra Expo International

Smt Sunita Vs National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases

M/S G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ram Babu Arya

M/S. Safexpress Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jitender Kuamr Yadav

M/S Calcutta Test House (P) Ltd. Vs Central Board of Trustees, E.P.F. Orginazation