Petitioner sought electricity connection but admitted ownership disputes. Counsel requested withdrawal in favor of wife; court dismissed petition and directed consideration of wife's fresh application.
Writ petition and connected complaints dismissed as withdrawn. Respondent directed to consider wife's fresh application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NARENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. L.S. Chaudhary, Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Ms.Swati, Advs.
versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED .... Respondent Through Mr. Deepak Pathak, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R
% 20.01.2016
The respondent shall consider the fresh application of the petitioner’s wife in accordance with the rules.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 20, 2016 dk
NARENDER KUMAR
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
