Petitioner sought writ urging BSF to decide an appeal. Respondent produced the decision, dispelling petitioner's claim of non-receipt. Court disposed of the petition.
None. Petition disposed based on submission that the appeal decision was already dispatched to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
NITIN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Mahapatra, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
%
O R D E R 19.01.2016
alia for issuing a writ of mandamus to the respondent No.2- BSF directing them to decide the petitioner’s appeal dated 08.10.2015 against the order dated 28.07.2015 passed by DIG & Commandant, STC BSF, Chakur, Maharashtra.
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) No.398/2016
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
JANUARY 19, 2016 r
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) No.398/2016
NITIN KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
BSF
HIMA KOHLI
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
