Petitioner agreed to waive penalty if user charges were paid regularly. Court disposed of petition based on parties' statement and directed that case should not be treated as precedent.
Penalty waived subject to regular payment of user charges according to non-domestic tariff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
Through: Mr. Vishal, Mr. Neelambari Perumal, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Swati Singh Malia and Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advs. for R1. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel for BSES with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 21.01.2016
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 21, 2016/ak
Deepak Prakash
State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
