The court disposed of the petition where the respondent, unable to pay the claimed Rs.55,038/-, settled for Rs.30,000/- payable in three instalments via post-dated cheques signed by his son, acceptable to the petitioner.
Petition disposed; settlement of Rs.30,000/- via three post-dated cheques accepted; liberty to revive if cheques dishonoured.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ROSYZ VEGAS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siju Thomas, Adv. along with petitioner in person.
versus
DHARAM DEO OJHA ..... Respondent Through: In person along with Mr. Vaishnav Kumar Ojha, son of the petitioner.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 19.01.2016
dishonour of any of the cheques handed over by the respondent to the petitioner.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 19, 2016/ dk
ROSYZ VEGAS
DHARAM DEO OJHA
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
