Petitioner's W.P.(C) 222/2016 disposed as petitioners submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 and obtained a No Objection Certificate, leaving nothing for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
CPL SHANKAR BHAGWAN SAH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Arvind Nayar with Ms. Nandadevi Deka, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Barkha Babbar with Mr. Ashok Chauhan, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Jagat Arora with Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R % 18.01.2016
Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the petitioner submitting a representation to the respondent No.2 in term of the order dated 12.1.2016, a No Objection Certificate has been issued in his favour. A result, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present petition, which is accordingly disposed of, along with the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
JANUARY 18, 2016/sk
CPL Shankar Bhagwan Sah
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
