Discusses three writ petitions by candidates seeking employment with Armed Forces. The court grants liberty to submit representations to respondents and remands for consideration in light of a batch decision before final disposal.
Liberty granted to petitioners to approach respondents with representations within one week for final disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:16.10.2024 15:47 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
o/o
ORDER 20.01.2016 *1" -s:-" - .
V.
V-
W.Ps.(C) 268, 278 & 305 of 2016 Page 2 of 3
is turned down by the respondents No.2 and 3, liberty be granted to the petitioners to seek their remedies in accordance with law.
V
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
JANUARY 20, 2016
s
W.Ps.(C) 268, 278 & 305 of 2016
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners who erred in not specifying Naxal area residence can have consideration for Constable posts granted.
Whether liberty should be granted to approach respondents with substantive representations before final disposal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Deepak Kumar Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.Referred¶10
Deepak Kumar Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (W.P.(C).5663/2013)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Staff Selection Commission
HIMA KOHLI
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
HIMA KOHLI and SUNIL GAUR
Parties & counsel
