The court disposed of a writ petition concerning the appointment of candidates to the post of CT/GD in SSB after obtaining confirmation that petitioners 1 to 3 were appointed and the fourth petitioner's status was satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
VIMLESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Divakar, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC, for respondent-UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
%
O R D E R 20.01.2016
W.P.(C) 4837/2015
Page 1 of 2
the name of the petitioner No.4-Ambika Yadav at Serial No.14. A copy of the said document/letter is handed over to learned counsel
for the petitioners and is also taken on record.
survives for adjudication.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
JANUARY 20, 2016 s
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 4837/2015
Vimesh Kumar Pandey and others
Union of India and others
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
