Md. Abdul Hamid v. UOI and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of three writ petitions regarding consideration of candidature for Constable posts. Liberty was granted to petitioners to submit substantive representations to the Staff Selection Commission within one week, with a direction to the respondents to pass a speaking order thereafter.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to submit substantive representations within one week; respondents directed to consider and pass speaking order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:16.10.2024 15:47 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
o/o
ORDER 20.01.2016 *1" -s:-" - .
- The present three petitions have been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondents No.2 and 3-Staff Selection Commission to consider their candidature to the post of Constables with the BSF/CISF/CRPF/SSB, in terms of the newspaper advertisement dated 5*^^ June, 2011.
V.
V-
- It is the case of all the petitioners that at the time of filing an application with the respondents, they had erroneously not specified that they are residents of a Naxal area in the State of Uttar Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that having failed to state so, though the petitioners have secured more marks than the last selected candidates, the respondents did not consider their applications and did not appoint them. 3. It has been enquired fronh learned counsel for the petitioners as to whether before approaching this Court, each of the petitioners have submitted substantive representations to the respondents No.2 and 3 for consideration. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be granted leave to withdraw the present petitions while reserving the right of the petitioners to submit substantive representations to the respondents No.2 and 3 and in the event their said representation
W.Ps.(C) 268, 278 & 305 of 2016 Page 2 of 3
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners can be granted liberty to submit substantive representations to the respondents before final disposal of their petitions regarding candidature consideration.
Whether liberty should be granted to withdraw petitions while reserving the right to approach respondents for representation submission.
Whether the Staff Selection Commission shall consider representations within one week and communicate a speaking order within four weeks .
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The petitioners
- respondent
Staff Selection Commission
Coram
HIMA KOHLI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court