The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate legal proceedings. The court dismissed the petition and application with such liberty.
Writ petition and application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate legal proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
A-ONE MARKETING DIVISION ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Mayank Bansal with Mr.Surya Kant Kaushik, Advocates.
versus
CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms.Shristi Banerjee, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate legal proceeding.
With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 18, 2016 KA
A-One Marketing Division
Chief Post Master General & Ors
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
