Aryan Nirnejak v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
In this review petition, the High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the plea that the lower court incorrectly held the petitioner did not apply for compassionate appointment, noting that another brother's earlier application was followed. The Court allowed the petitioner to separately pursue grievances regarding alleged fraud.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition and review application rejected; liberty granted to pursue separate administrative remedies.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
REVP No. 99 of 2022
1. Aryan Nirnejak S/o Late Anjani Kumar Nirnejak Aged About 20 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Malhar Road, Masturi, Tahsil And Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Directorate Of Public Education Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Joint Director, School Education, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
4. District Education Officer, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there are sufficient grounds to allow the review petition challenging the finding that the petitioner had not applied for compassionate appointment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aryan Nirnejak S/o Late Anjani Kumar Nirnejak
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department Of School Education
- respondent
Director, Directorate Of Public Education
- respondent
Joint Director, School Education, District Bilaspur
- respondent
District Education Officer, District Bilaspur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- REVP/99/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court