The High Court rejected a review petition filed by the EPFO, dismissing it by aligning with the view taken in an identical matter, REVP No. 62/2022.
The review petition stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet
REVP No. 101 of 2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| 05/07/2022 | Shri Ajay Kumar Dwivedi, Counsel for Petitioner. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking review of the order dated 11.04.2022 passed in WPS No. 2534/2022. A review petition of identical nature came up before this Court on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022(Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization v. R. S. Sharma & another). The grounds raised by the petitioner seeking review are all identical in nature. In view of the same, this Court is inclined to take the same view in the present review petition as well. Accordingly, the present review petition stands rejected in terms of the order passed on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
|---|---|
| Jyoti |
Central Board Of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Madhuri Verma
Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
