Narendra Kumar Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh HCREVP/108/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet Review…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
¶2
Order Sheet
¶3
Review Petition No. 108 of 2022
¶4
- Narendra Kumar Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Badrilal Chandrakar, Aged About 46 Years Working As Head Master And Posted At Govt. Primary School Nayapara Bhawanipur, Block Palari, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
¶5
- Manoj Kumar Chandrakar, S/o Shri Fatturam Chandrakar, Aged About 44 Years Working As Head Master And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kaudiya, Block Palari, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
¶6
- Khelan Prasad Chandrakar, S/o Late Shri Radhelal Chandrakar, Aged About 48 Years Working As Head Master And Posted At Govt. Primary School Chherkadih, Block Palari, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
¶7
- Vijay Kumar Chandrakar, S/o Shri Shankar Lal Chandrakar, Aged About 50 Years Working As Head Master And Posted At Govt. Primary School Sehda, Block Palari, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh.
¶8
---- Petitioner
¶9
Versus
¶10
- State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Narendra Kumar Chandrakar
- petitioner
Manoj Kumar Chandrakar
- petitioner
Khelan Prasad Chandrakar
- petitioner
Vijay Kumar Chandrakar
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- REVP/108/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court