This High Court of Calcutta dismissed a contempt application for non-appearance of the petitioner. The court concluded that the petitioner was no longer interested in pursuing the matter filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08-09-2022 Item no.10
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.848 of 2000 Shree Prakash Singh
-vs-
Mr. Sailesh Chandra Dey & Anr.
arising out of WPA No.12274 of 1999
None …for the petitioner
None represents the applicant to press the contempt application on call.
This is a contempt application filed on May 10, 2000 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India seeking punishment of the contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated October 4, 1999 passed in WP No.12274(W) of 1999.
Since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is interested to proceed with the contempt application for non-compliance of an order in WP No.12274(W) of 1999.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shree Prakash Singh
Mr. Sailesh Chandra Dey & Anr.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
