The High Court at Calcutta dismissed an application for contempt filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as the petitioners appeared no longer interested in proceeding due to the non-appearance of their representatives.
The contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08-09-2022 Item no.8
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.401 of 2000 Moinur Islam Tarafdar & Ors.
-vs-
Mr. S.K. Dasgupta & Ors. arising out of WPA No.6699 (W) of 1999
None …for the petitioners
None represents the applicants to press the contempt application on call.
This is a contempt application filed on March 18, 2000 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeking punishment of the contemners/ respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated August 6, 1999 passed in WP No.6699(W) of 1999.
Since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Subrata Bhattacharyya
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
