The High Court of Calcutta, Special Jurisdiction, dismissed a contempt application filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The court observed that the petitioner, aged about 75 years at the time of affirmation, was no longer interested to proceed due to the non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08-09-2022 Item no.6
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.133 of 2000 Shri Rathindra Roy Chowdhury -vs-
Shri Subhash Kundu
arising out of CO. No.13645(W) of 1995
None …for the petitioner
None turns up to press the contempt application on
call.
This contempt application has been filed on January 14, 2000 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeking punishment of the contemner/concerned respondent in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated July 6, 1998 passed in CO No.13645(W) of 1995.
Since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
While the application was affirmed, the applicant was aged about 75 years.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application shall be dismissed for non-appearance of the Applicant at the stage of printing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Rathindra Roy Chowdhury
Shri Subhash Kundu
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
