Under Art 215 of the Constitution and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, a contempt application by petitioners against respondents for non-compliance with an order was filed. The petitioners failed to appear or press the application. The court found the petitioners no longer interested and dismissed the application for non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08-09-2022 Item no.7
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.266 of 2000 Shymlal Saha & Anr.
-vs-
Arun Kiran Chakraborty & Ors.
arising out of CO. No.1861(W) of 1995
None …for the petitioners
None represents the applicants to press the contempt application on call.
This contempt application has been filed on February 7, 2000 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India seeking punishment of the contemners/ respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated February 3, 1995 passed in CO No.1861(W) of 1995.
Since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Contempt application pending non-compliance with writ order dismissed for non-appearance of petitioners.
Shymlal Saha & Anr.
Arun Kiran Chakraborty & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
