Applicant in a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 failed to appear. The court dismissed the application for non-appearance after finding the applicant was no longer interested to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07-09-2022 Item no.15
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.1592 of 2001 Sri Jay Kumar Chatterjee
-vs-
Sri Bimal Ranjan Gangopadhyay & Ors.
arising out of WPA No.7137 of 2001
None …for the petitioner
None appears for the petitioner on call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed on November 28, 2001 seeking punishment of the contemners/the first and second respondents in the writ petition for violation of an order dated July 4, 2001 passed in WP No.7137(W) of 2001.
I find that since filing of the application, none moved to press this contempt application.
Considering all aspects of the matter, I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Sri Jay Kumar Chatterjee
Sri Bimal Ranjan Gangopadhyay & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
