Dismissed
Iswar Ch.Vidyasagar Samabai Nibas Ltd. v. Ujjal Kr. Das
Calcutta HCCPAN/1574/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2001 In W.P. 9 (W) of 1999 Iswar Chandra…
What the court decided
AI extract
2001 In W.P. 9 (W) of 1999 Iswar Chandra…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 07.9 No.
14 2022 14 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 1574 of 2001 In W.P. 9 (W) of 1999 Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar Samabai Nibas Ltd. & Ors. –VersusUjjal Kumar Das
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is an application under the Contempt of Court’s Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner on 1st December 2001.
The petitioner by filing the instant application, sought for punishment of the contemnor / respondent for violation of order dated 22nd November 2000 passed by a learned Single Bench in W.P. 9 (W) of 1999. While this application was affirmed the petitioner, Pradipta Kumar Mazumdar was aged about 61 years. I find that none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to move the contempt application.
Considering all aspects of the matter, I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Therefore, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar Samabai Nibas Ltd. & Ors.
Ujjal Kumar Das
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court