Sunil P. Deshmukh Vibha Kankanwadi

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6796 OF 2020 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO.14527 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13747 OF 2017 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER VERSUS RAJARAM NAMDEO SUDKE AND ANOTHE

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6522 OF 2020 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO.14527 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13747 OF 2017 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER VERSUS RAJARAM NAMDEO SUDKE AND ANOTHE

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6522 OF 2020 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO.14527 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13747 OF 2017 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER VERSUS RAJARAM NAMDEO SUDKE AND ANOTHE

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6796 OF 2020 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO.14527 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13747 OF 2017 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER VERSUS RAJARAM NAMDEO SUDKE AND ANOTHE

:: 1 :: fmp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3233 OF 2020 FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.8773 OF 2020 The Administrator, City & Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. … APPLICANT VERSUS Shafiq Ahmed H

DATE : 8 th OCTOBER, 2020 ORDER : 1. Learned advocates for the parties state that the parties to the appeal have settled all their disputes in terms of written down compromise. Learned advocates further refer to that the terms of compromise

No.19/2020 (( 1 )) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.19 OF 2020 1. Himanshu Pradeep Patil, Age 27 years, Occu. Private Service, R/o A -12/502, Shankeshwar Nagar, Manpada Road, Near Shani M

COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.19 OF 2014 WITH SECOND APPEAL NOS.753 OF 2018 & 336 OF 2010 BABASAHEB HARIBHAU MUNDHE VS MEENA BABASAHEB MUNDHE ***** Mr.UB Bondar, Advocate for Appellant. ----- CORAM

vdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14533 OF 2019 Sudhir s/o Bhagwan Thombare …..Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ..... Respondents ....... Mr. Anant R. Devakate, Advocate

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 ORDER : 1. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “B” and “C” and is disposed of . 2. Upon amendment being carried out, issue notice of writ petition to respondent No. 6 on the amended designation

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 {2} ca14027-19 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 {2} ca14027-19 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 {2} ca14027-19 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 {2} ca14027-19 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. {2} ca14049-19 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. {2} ca14049-19 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. {2} ca14049-19 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 {2} ca14027-19 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 ORDER : 1. Issue notice to respondents. Mr. S. S. Panale, learned advocate, waives service for the respondent – claimants. {2} ca14049-19 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties by consent. 3. Learned AGP refer

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 ORDER : 1. Heard learned advocates for the parties. Learned advocates for respondents, on instructions, state that they have no particular objection if civil application is allowed. 2. In view of aforesaid and for

DATE : 6 th DECEMBER, 2019 ORDER : 1. Heard learned advocates for the parties. Learned advocates for respondents, on instructions, state that they have no particular objection if civil application is allowed. 2. In view of aforesaid and for

vdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7722 OF 2017 M/s Borse Brothers Engineers and Contractors Private Ltd., through its GPA holdedr, Shri Jitendra Bhatu Sonawane …..Petitioner VERSUS The State

DATE : 05th DECEMBER, 2019. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.3 on 03-12- 2019, in paragraph No.6 it is stated with respect to the case of the petitioner that; “I say

DATE : 05th DECEMBER, 2019. ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) 1. It appears to be the case of the petitioners that, a few similarly situated employees had earlier on approached principal seat at Mumbai, in Writ Petitions No. 313 o

vdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6933 OF 2017 Santosh s/o Achyutrao Tidke …..Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ..... Respondents ....... Mr. Vitthal Maind, Advocate hold