The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition by refusing to adjudicate an interlocutory request pending further developments in the related original application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14533.19WP
1
vdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 14533 OF 2019
Sudhir s/o Bhagwan Thombare …..Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others ..... Respondents
Mr. Anant R. Devakate, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. N. Kendre, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no. 1 Mr. Avinash Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no. 3
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.
DATE : 6th December, 2019
ORDER :
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE
vdk/14533.19WP
Sudhir s/o Bhagwan Thombare
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil P. Deshmukh
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
