Hanmant Pandhari Shettiwar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
DATE : 05th DECEMBER, 2019. PER COURT : 1.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 WRIT PETITION NO.10316 OF 2017
HANMANT PANDHARI SHETTIWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Panpatte V.S. AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3 : Mr. P. N. Kutti. Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. P. S. Dikle.
[ CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.]
DATE : 05th DECEMBER, 2019.
PER COURT :
2. In the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.3 on 03-12-
2019, in paragraph No.6 it is stated with respect to the case of the petitioner that;
“I say and submit that, after hearing the parties the respondent No.3 i.e. office of the present deponent had cancelled the earlier approval vide decision dated 07-072017. I say that, thereafter, as per the direction of this Hon’ble High Court a hearing was conducted in the office of the Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad on 23-102018. I say and submit that, at the time of hearing before the Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad Region,
2
WP 10316-2017
Aurangabad it was transpired that, the appointment of the petitioner is made from reserve category i.e. schedule tribe. I say that, the Asstt. Commissioner, B. C. cell has also verified the roster of the respondents No.4 and 5, therefore, the Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad confirmed the order dated 25-10-2013 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani.”
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [ SUNIL P.DESHMUKH ] JUDGE JUDGE
vjg/-.
HANMANT PANDHARI SHETTIWAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
OTHERS
SUNIL P DESHMUKH
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court