The Family Court disposed of Family Court Appeal No. 61 of 2019 on a written compromise between the parties, ensuring the interests of the minor were protected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fca61-19
{1}
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.61 OF 2019
Shantanu Vijay Joshi
APPELLANT
VERSUS
Yogini @ Neha w/o Shantanu Joshi Yogini @ Neha d/o Vijay Sangmule and Another RESPONDENTS
Mr. S. R. Deshpande, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Pradeep N. Sonpethkar, Advocate for respondents
DATE : 8 th OCTOBER, 2020
ORDER :
{2} fca61-19
and that the parties have signed the deed of compromise in their presence before Registrar (Judicial) and the Registrar has duly verified the compromise deed. It is submitted that none of the terms of the compromise is opposed to any public policy nor are they forbidden by any law.
[R. G. AVACHAT] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/fca61-19
Shantanu Vijay Joshi
Yogini @ Neha w/o Shantanu Joshi
Vijay Sangmule
R. G. AVACHAT
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
