The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed four civil applications sought by the State. The learned AGP highlighted delay in the absence of contrary evidence, leading to the disposal of the applications.
The civil applications were allowed in terms of the prayer clause and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
ca14027-19
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14027 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 36647 OF 2019
The State of Maharashtra and Others APPLICANTS
VERSUS
Govind Nivruti Mashal RESPONDENT
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14029 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 36784 OF 2019
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14031 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 36773 OF 2019
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14033 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 36781 OF 2019
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14035 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 36777 OF 2019
Mr. G. O. Wattamwar, AGP for applicant - State Mr. S. S. Panale, Advocate for respondent - Claimants
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.] DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2019
{2}
ca14027-19
ORDER :
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/ca14027-19
The State of Maharashtra
Govind Nivruti Mashal
Sunil P. Deshmukh
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
