Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition as the underlying purpose was worked out. The court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw writ petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6933.17WP
vdk
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6933 OF 2017
Santosh s/o Achyutrao Tidke …..Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others ..... Respondents
....... Mr. Vitthal Maind, Advocate holding for Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S. N. Kendre, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no. 1
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.
DATE : 4th December, 2019
ORDER :
leave to withdraw writ petition since the purpose underlying present writ petition is stated to have been worked out.
3. Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE
vdk/6933.17WP
Santosh s/o Achyutrao Tidke
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil P. Deshmukh
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
