Dismissed
Sandip Gajanan Rane v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/60/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
60-21 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-PIL 60-21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 60 OF 2021
Sandip Gajanan Rane .. Petitioner
Vs. Union of India .. Respondent
Mr. Sandip G. Rane for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2021.
P. C. :
[G. S. KULKARNI, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
Sandip Gajanan Rane
Union of India
DIPANKAR DATTA
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court