This High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an interim order as infructuous because the underlying suit had been disposed of. No costs were awarded.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VIDYASURESHAMIN Digitally signedby VIDYASURESH AMINDate:2021.09.0312:12:10 +0530
1
45.WP395_2010
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 395 OF 2010
Swatantrya Sainik Cooperative Hsg. Society Ltd.… Petitioner
Vs.
Datta Cooperative Hsg. Society Ltd. & Ors.… Respondents
Mr Tejpal S. Ingale for Petitioner.
Mr M.M. Pable AGP for State.
CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 27th AUGUST 2021
P.C.:
1. Mr. Ingale, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the
challenge in this petition was against an interim order passed in the
proceedings. He states that the suit itself has been now disposed of and
hence, the petition is rendered infructuous.
2. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
Swatantrya Sainik Cooperative Hsg. Society Ltd.
Datta Cooperative Hsg. Society Ltd.
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court