The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, allowed the petitioner to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 75 of 2021 and disposed of the matter as withdrawn following the deposit of security money and donation to the Bar Association.
Leave granted to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation; the PIL is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
103-pil-75-2021
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
103 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.75 OF 2021
KAILAS ARJUN MALI ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Dipesh D. Pande, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.
DATED : 06th SEPTEMBER, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.The learned counsel for the petitioner on
instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Public
Interest Litigation. Leave granted to withdraw the
Public Interest Litigation.
2.The Public Interest Litigation is disposed
of as withdrawn.
3.The petitioner has deposited an amount of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.One Lakh Only) pursuant to the
orders of this Court. The learned counsel for the
petitioner on instructions of the petitioner
graciously agrees to donate an amount of
Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand Only) to the
Aurangabad High Court Bar Association.
4.In light of that, an amount of Rs.25,000/-
(Rs.Twenty Five Thousand Only) be remitted to the
(2) 103-pil-75-2021
Aurangabad High Court Bar Association. The
remaining amount of Rs.75,000/- (Rs.Seventy Five
Thousand Only) is allowed to be withdrawn by the
petitioner.
(R. N. LADDHA) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/September-2021
Kailas Arjun Mali
The State of Maharashtra and Others
R. N. Laddha
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court