In this disposed P.I.L., the court held that due steps were taken by the respondents regarding the prayer for custody of bulls, leaving nothing for decision. The petition was disposed of.
The petition was disposed of with no costs as nothing survived for decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL / 28 /2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 28 OF 2020
Shrinivas Nandlal Dhuppad ... Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Maharashtra and others
... Respondents
Mr. Satyajit S. Bora, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. S.R. Yadav-Lonikar, AGP for respondent – State
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ AND
S. S. SHINDE, J.
DATE : AUGUST 27, 2021
PC :
2 PIL / 28 /2020
He has also referred to communication dated 17-08-2021 issued by the Regional Manager, Frozen Semen Laboratory, Harsul, Aurangabad.
[S. S. SHINDE, J.] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]
arp/
Shrinivas Nandlal Dhuppad
State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
S. S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
