The petitioner failed to deposit the amount directed by the Court. Relying on this failure, the Court disposed of the Public Interest Litigation without costs.
The Public Interest Litigation was disposed of. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 pil 76.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
992 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.76 OF 2021
PARASRAM VYANKOBA MANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Ingole Govind Rangrao
AGP for Respondents/State: Mrs. M. A. Deshpande
...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE:20th AUGUST, 2021
PER COURT:
1.The amount as directed by this Court is not
deposited.
2.Mr. Ingole, learned Advocate for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a
position to deposit the amount.
3.In view of that, the Public Interest
Litigation is disposed of. No costs.
marathe
PARASRAM VYANKOBA MANE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court