The petitioner in person sought leave to withdraw his review petition. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the matter without costs.
The review petition is permitted to be withdrawn. It stands disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by PRASHANT PRASHANT VILAS VILAS RANE RANE Date: 2021.08.25 20:33:32 +0530
P.V.Rane 11rpw51-21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.51 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8052 OF 2019
Sharad S.Pente … Petitioner vs. Union of India & Ors. … Respondents ---
Mr.Sharad S.Pente, Petitioner-in-person present.
Mr.Sumit Kate i/b. Dr.Uday P.Warunjikar, Amicus Curiae.
Mr.Ashutosh R.Gole with Mr.Neel Helekar with Mr.Kanhaiya S.Yadav, for respondent No.1-Union of India.
---
C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2021
PC :
1. After hearing progressed to some length, the petitioner
appearing in person seeks leave to withdraw this review petition.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Sharad S.Pente
Union of India & Ors.
DIPANKAR DATTA
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
