Honours declined to prosecute two pending PILs due to the absence of the parties. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petitions while keeping the substantive issues raised therein open.
Petitions dismissed for non-prosecution; issues kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 2 OF 2013
Manoj B. Waghmare. ..Petitioner. Versus
The Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corp. and Others. ..Respondents.
WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 20 OF 2013
Hardas Hazarimal Tharwani. ..Petitioner. Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others.
..Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Mrs. R. M. Shinde, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. V. D. Patil for Respondent No. 1 in PIL No. 2 of 2013 Mrs. S. V. Bharucha and Mr. A.R.Varma for Respondent No. 5 and 6 in PIL No. 2 of 2013.
Mr. S. M. Kamble for Respondent No. 5 in PIL No. 20 of 2013.. Mr. V. N. Tayade for Respondent No. 10 to 13.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : August 8, 2018 .
P. C. :
[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr Sachin Digitally signed bySachin Ramchandra Ramchandra Patil Patil Date: 2018.08.1013:31:35 +0530
Manoj B. Waghmare
Hardas Hazarimal Tharwani
The Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corp.
The State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
