Thepetitionerssoughtleave to withdrawWritPetitionNo.3829of2017,whichisdispensedwithandrejectedbythisCourt.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted and the writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902 wp 3829.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3829 OF 2017
Rupesh Narayan Samge and ors. …..Petitioners versus The Pune Metropolitan Region, Development Authority, Pune and anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Mihir Raut i/b. Mr. Nitin Deshpande, advocate for the petitioners.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATE : 8th AUGUST, 2018.
P. C. :
Mr. Raut, learned counsel for the petitioners, having taken
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave as prayed for, is
granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Digitally signed by Shubhada Shubhada Shankar Shankar Kadam Kadam Date: 2018.08.09 10:59:44 +0530
Rupesh Narayan Samge ors.
The Pune Metropolitan Region, Development Authority, Pune
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
